Research Date: February 2026 Data Source: IndustryLabs database — 67 AI-native HR tools Last Updated: February 21, 2026
Greenhouse is one of the most widely adopted applicant tracking systems in the technology and professional services sectors, known for its structured hiring methodology, deep integration ecosystem, and reporting capabilities. Founded in 2012 and headquartered in New York City, Greenhouse was built on the thesis that hiring quality improves when the process is structured, consistent, and data-driven — with defined scorecards, calibrated interview kits, and measurable decision criteria applied uniformly across all candidates for every role. It has become the de facto ATS of choice for many technology companies scaling from Series B through to enterprise, and has maintained a strong position among companies that treat hiring quality as a competitive advantage.
What is Greenhouse ATS?
Quick Answer
Greenhouse is an applicant tracking system built around structured hiring — a methodology in which every role has a defined interview plan, scored evaluation criteria, and consistent decision-making documentation. It covers the full recruiting workflow from job creation and approval through sourcing, application review, structured interviewing, offer management, and reporting. Founded in 2012 in New York City, it primarily serves companies with 50 to 5,000 employees in technology, professional services, and high-growth sectors. According to IndustryLabs analysis of 67 AI-native HR tools, Greenhouse's integration breadth — over 400 native integrations — is among the widest in the applicant tracking category.
Greenhouse was co-founded by Daniel Chait and Jon Stross, who had both experienced the dysfunction of unstructured hiring first-hand as operators and decided the core problem was not a technology shortfall but a process shortfall. Their structured hiring methodology — codified in Greenhouse and supported by training programmes, professional services, and a library of role-specific interview kits — is designed to remove the subjective, inconsistent elements of interviewing that research consistently links to poor hiring outcomes, bias, and high regret hire rates.
The platform operates across three core functional areas. Recruiting Operations covers everything from job requisition creation and approval workflows through job board distribution, application review, and candidate pipeline management. Structured Interviewing provides interview kits with specific questions tied to scoreable competencies, interview guides for each panel member, and a feedback collection workflow that aggregates scores before interviewers discuss the candidate to minimise anchoring bias. Reporting and Analytics provides hiring metrics across the full funnel — source effectiveness, time-to-fill, pipeline conversion rates, offer acceptance rates, and DE&I demographic reporting.
Who is Greenhouse ATS best for?
Quick Answer
Greenhouse is best for talent acquisition teams at technology, professional services, and high-growth companies with 50 to 5,000 employees that want to implement structured, consistent, data-driven hiring across a growing organisation. It is particularly strong for companies where hiring quality, interviewer consistency, and DE&I accountability are strategic priorities, and where the recruiting team is sophisticated enough to configure and maintain a structured interview process rather than relying on default ATS workflows.
Greenhouse is not typically the right choice for very early stage companies (fewer than 20 employees) where an ATS adds process overhead without meaningful scale benefit, or for high-volume hourly hiring environments where the structured interviewing methodology is inappropriate for the speed and volume of roles being filled.
The ideal Greenhouse buyer is a Head of Talent, Recruiting Operations Manager, or VP of People at a Series B or later technology company, or a mid-market professional services firm, that has outgrown spreadsheet-based tracking and wants to establish a repeatable, measurable, bias-mitigated hiring process. Company size sweet spot is 100 to 2,500 employees, though Greenhouse is used by companies significantly above and below that range. According to IndustryLabs analysis of 67 AI-native HR tools, Greenhouse's structured hiring approach is a genuine differentiator — most ATS platforms provide customisable workflows without the embedded methodology and training ecosystem that Greenhouse pairs with the technology.
What are Greenhouse ATS's key features?
Quick Answer
Greenhouse's key features include job requisition management with configurable approval workflows, structured interview kits with competency-scored evaluation criteria, automated job board distribution to LinkedIn, Indeed, and 400+ job sites, a candidate pipeline management interface with pipeline views and stage-specific actions, offer management with approval workflows and e-signature, and reporting dashboards covering source quality, pipeline conversion, time-to-fill, offer acceptance, and DE&I funnel metrics.
Greenhouse's structured interview kits are the feature that most distinguishes the platform from commodity ATS tools. Each interview kit is built around a specific set of competencies tied to the role, with interview questions assigned to specific interviewers and scored on defined rubrics. The platform's feedback forms are structured to collect scoreable data before interviewers see each other's responses, and the debrief workflow aggregates all scores before the hiring manager leads a calibration discussion. This prevents the most common forms of interviewer bias — anchoring on initial impressions, social conformity in feedback, and inconsistent evaluation standards across different candidates.
The job distribution capability — Greenhouse distributes job postings to LinkedIn, Indeed, Glassdoor, and over 400 additional job boards simultaneously — reduces the manual effort of multi-channel distribution. Sourcing integrations with LinkedIn Recruiter and other sourcing tools allow recruiters to push candidates discovered externally directly into Greenhouse pipelines. Offer management includes configurable approval workflows, compensation benchmarking integrations, and e-signature for completed offers.
Greenhouse's reporting suite is among the most comprehensive in the ATS market. The standard reports cover source effectiveness by channel and role type, time-in-stage analysis for pipeline bottleneck identification, interview-to-offer and offer-to-acceptance rates, and demographic funnel analytics for DE&I accountability. The advanced analytics module provides custom reporting for organisations that need to slice hiring data by business unit, geography, or hiring manager. You can view Greenhouse's full profile at /tools/greenhouse.
How much does Greenhouse ATS cost?
Quick Answer
Greenhouse pricing is based on company size (total headcount, not recruiting team size) and scales from approximately £6,000 per year for companies with under 50 employees to over £50,000 per year for large mid-market companies, with enterprise contracts negotiated individually. Greenhouse does not publish a public pricing page; buyers receive quotes after a sales discovery process. Implementation costs vary by configuration complexity.
Pricing is estimated based on public information and may not reflect current vendor pricing. Verify directly with the vendor.
Greenhouse's headcount-based pricing model means costs scale with business growth — a company that grows from 200 to 500 employees will see its Greenhouse contract increase at renewal. This is a different model from per-seat (recruiter) or per-hire pricing structures used by other ATS platforms and is worth factoring into multi-year total cost of ownership projections. Implementation is typically self-managed with support from Greenhouse's onboarding team, though professional services engagements are available for complex configurations involving custom integrations or data migrations from legacy systems. According to IndustryLabs analysis of 67 AI-native HR tools, Greenhouse's pricing falls in the £10–50K annual band for most mid-market deployments, consistent with other enterprise-grade structured hiring platforms.
What does Greenhouse ATS integrate with?
Quick Answer
Greenhouse integrates with over 400 platforms including Workday, BambooHR, and ADP for HRIS synchronisation, LinkedIn Recruiter, SeekOut, and Gem for sourcing, Slack and Microsoft Teams for notifications and hiring manager workflows, Docusign and Adobe Sign for e-signature, HireVue and other assessment platforms for candidate evaluation, and background check services including Checkr and Sterling.
Greenhouse's integration ecosystem is one of its most commercially significant assets. The 400+ native integrations cover every category of adjacent HR technology: sourcing intelligence tools, assessment and testing platforms, background check services, payroll and HRIS systems, video interviewing solutions, employee reference checking tools, job board distribution networks, and collaboration platforms. This breadth means Greenhouse rarely requires custom API development for organisations with conventional recruiting stacks — the integration they need almost certainly exists in the Greenhouse marketplace.
The Workday integration is the most strategically important for enterprise buyers: bi-directional synchronisation of employee data, org chart information, and job requisitions ensures that Greenhouse's hiring data flows into Workday as the system of record without manual data entry. BambooHR, ADP, and other HRIS integrations follow similar patterns for mid-market organisations. The Slack integration delivers hiring decision requests, interview feedback reminders, and offer approval notifications within the collaboration platform that recruiting teams and hiring managers already work in. For a full view of the applicant tracking systems market and Greenhouse's position within it, the IndustryLabs category page provides verified data across competing platforms.
Is Greenhouse ATS GDPR / SOC 2 / ISO 27001 compliant?
Quick Answer
Greenhouse claims GDPR compliance and SOC 2 Type II certification. For UK and EU employers, GDPR compliance is critical given the volumes of candidate personal data Greenhouse processes — applications, CVs, interview notes, assessment scores, and offer documents. SOC 2 Type II certification addresses enterprise security and data handling requirements that procurement teams in regulated sectors typically require before approving new HR technology vendors.
Compliance certifications are vendor-supplied. IndustryLabs has not independently audited these claims. Verify current certification status directly with the vendor.
Greenhouse's GDPR compliance framework covers the standard requirements for ATS platforms operating in the EU and UK: consent management for candidate data collection, configurable data retention periods, candidate rights request fulfilment (access, erasure, portability), and data processing agreements with sub-processors. UK and EU buyers should confirm that Greenhouse's EU data residency option is included in their agreement if regulatory requirements mandate in-region data storage, and should review the platform's handling of automated scoring or filtering features under the EU AI Act's high-risk AI system classifications. The SOC 2 Type II certification provides audit-period coverage of security and availability controls — a standard requirement for enterprise technology procurement in financial services, healthcare, and other regulated sectors.
How does Greenhouse ATS compare to alternatives?
Quick Answer
Greenhouse's closest alternatives in the ATS market are Lever, Ashby, and Workday Recruiting. Lever combines ATS with a native talent CRM in a single platform (TRM model), making it stronger for proactive pipeline building. Ashby is a newer, analytics-first ATS built for data-driven recruiting operations teams. Workday Recruiting is the natural choice for organisations fully standardised on Workday HCM who want to avoid a separate ATS vendor. Each addresses a distinct buyer profile.
Lever competes directly with Greenhouse in the mid-market ATS space but with a distinct positioning. Lever's TRM (Talent Relationship Management) model natively combines an ATS with a CRM, making it stronger for organisations that want to build proactive talent pipelines and nurture relationships with passive candidates as a first-class workflow within their ATS — rather than adding a separate CRM tool. Greenhouse's CRM capabilities are less developed, but its structured hiring methodology and integration breadth are typically stronger.
Ashby is a more recent entrant that has gained significant traction among data-driven recruiting operations teams at high-growth technology companies. Ashby's analytics capabilities are more powerful than Greenhouse's out-of-the-box reporting, and its all-in-one model (ATS + scheduling + analytics + CRM) reduces integration complexity. It is strongest for companies that treat recruiting as a metrics-driven operation and want deep analytical visibility into every stage of the hiring funnel without custom data engineering.
Workday Recruiting is the default ATS consideration for any organisation that has already standardised on Workday HCM. The integration simplicity and single-vendor relationship are commercially attractive, but Workday Recruiting's user experience and feature depth in structured interviewing and analytics are generally considered weaker than Greenhouse's dedicated ATS product.
Want a personalised comparison of Greenhouse ATS vs alternatives matched to your company size, budget, and integrations? Get a free evaluation report →