Tool Reviews//7 min read

Ashby Review 2026: Features, Pricing & Alternatives

Ashby review 2026: all-in-one ATS with analytics and scheduling. Features, pricing, integrations, GDPR compliance and alternatives.

I
IndustryLabs
|Updated February 21, 2026

Research Date: February 2026 Data Source: IndustryLabs database — 67 AI-native HR tools Last Updated: February 21, 2026


Ashby is a modern all-in-one recruiting platform that combines an ATS, scheduling automation, CRM, and advanced analytics in a single product built for data-driven recruiting operations. Founded in 2018 and headquartered in San Francisco, California, Ashby was built by engineers with operational experience in high-growth technology companies who were frustrated by the limitations of existing ATS platforms — particularly their inadequate reporting capabilities and their fragmented workflow tooling that required recruiters to switch between multiple disconnected systems. Ashby's differentiation is its emphasis on operational analytics: providing recruiting teams with granular, real-time visibility into every stage of their hiring funnel, at a level of detail that previously required custom data engineering or expensive BI tooling to achieve.

What is Ashby?

Quick Answer

Ashby is an all-in-one recruiting platform combining an ATS, interview scheduling automation, talent CRM, and advanced analytics in a single product. It is designed for recruiting operations teams that treat hiring as a metrics-driven function and want granular, customisable reporting on every stage of the hiring funnel without requiring custom data work. Founded in 2018 in San Francisco, it primarily serves fast-growing technology companies with 50 to 2,000 employees. According to IndustryLabs analysis of 67 AI-native HR tools, Ashby's analytics depth within an all-in-one recruiting product is a differentiator shared by fewer than 10% of platforms in the database.

Ashby was founded by Benji Encz and Benjamin Encz, engineers from companies including Lyft, Gusto, and Stripe. The founding insight was that most ATS platforms were designed for recruiters, not for the recruiting operations function — they tracked candidates through workflows but did not provide the operational intelligence that heads of recruiting and recruiting analytics teams needed to manage hiring capacity, forecast throughput, or diagnose funnel inefficiencies. Ashby was designed from the ground up with the analytics layer as a first-class product requirement rather than a reporting afterthought.

The platform operates across four integrated product areas. Applicant Tracking handles the core ATS workflow: job creation, application management, pipeline review, structured feedback, and offer management. Scheduling Automation eliminates manual interview coordination by automating the process of finding mutually available times across multiple interview panels, generating personalised scheduling links, and sending confirmations. CRM provides pipeline building, candidate nurturing, and tag-based segmentation for proactive sourcing. Analytics delivers customisable dashboards, funnel conversion analysis, recruiter capacity planning, and a report builder for generating custom metrics without requiring data engineering involvement.

Who is Ashby best for?

Quick Answer

Ashby is best for recruiting operations teams and heads of talent at fast-growing technology companies with 50 to 2,000 employees who treat recruiting as a metrics-driven function and want granular, real-time visibility into pipeline health, recruiter capacity, and funnel conversion without custom data engineering. It is particularly strong for companies that run structured, process-oriented recruiting operations and want scheduling automation, CRM, and analytics in the same tool as their ATS.

Ashby is less suited to large enterprise organisations with multinational compliance complexity that typically require more established enterprise-grade infrastructure, or to smaller companies where the depth of Ashby's analytics capabilities exceeds what the hiring volume justifies.

The ideal Ashby buyer is a Head of Recruiting, Recruiting Operations Manager, or VP of People at a Series B to Series D technology company that has outgrown a simpler ATS (Workable, Teamtailor, or early-stage Greenhouse usage) and wants a platform purpose-built for a sophisticated recruiting operations function. Ashby has been adopted most heavily by companies in the venture-backed technology ecosystem — including customers like Ramp, Deel, and OpenAI — where hiring velocity, recruiter productivity, and data-driven decision making are central to the people function's operating model. According to IndustryLabs analysis of 67 AI-native HR tools, Ashby's target buyer profile is relatively narrow — it serves a sophisticated recruiting operations audience rather than a general-purpose ATS market.

What are Ashby's key features?

Quick Answer

Ashby's key features include an advanced analytics suite with customisable funnel conversion dashboards and a self-service report builder, automated interview scheduling that coordinates multi-panel availability without manual coordination, a built-in talent CRM for pipeline building and candidate nurturing, structured ATS workflows with configurable scorecards and offer management, and AI-assisted job description writing and candidate deduplication.

Ashby's analytics suite is its most commercially significant differentiator. The out-of-the-box dashboards cover every standard recruiting metric — time-to-fill, time-in-stage, source quality, offer acceptance rates, pipeline conversion by stage and role type — but the self-service report builder is what distinguishes Ashby from standard ATS reporting. Recruiters and recruiting ops teams can build custom reports by selecting dimensions and metrics without writing SQL or involving a data analyst. Recruiter capacity planning tools allow heads of talent to model hiring throughput against recruiter bandwidth, informing decisions about when to hire additional recruiting resources before pipelines start to deteriorate.

Scheduling automation is Ashby's second most valued capability for customers. The platform coordinates multi-panel interview scheduling by pulling real-time calendar availability from all required participants, generating a scheduling link for the candidate, and automatically booking confirmed slots across all calendars simultaneously. For technical interviews involving multiple engineers on a panel — a common format at technology companies — this saves hours of coordination per interview loop. The automation extends to reschedule handling and reminder sequences without recruiter intervention.

The CRM layer provides pipeline building, candidate nurturing sequences, and segmentation tools similar to Lever's TRM model, though Ashby's CRM is generally considered less developed than Lever's as a relationship management tool and more focused on sourcing pipeline organisation. AI features include job description optimisation suggestions and automatic deduplication of candidate records across sourcing channels. You can view Ashby's full profile at /tools/ashby.

How much does Ashby cost?

Quick Answer

Ashby pricing is based on company headcount and the tier of features required. Based on publicly available market data, annual contracts typically range from £7,500 to £50,000 for companies in the 50 to 2,000 employee range, with pricing scaling based on headcount and whether advanced analytics, CRM, and automation features are included in the tier contracted. Ashby does not publish a public pricing page; buyers receive custom quotes following a demo and discovery process.

Pricing is estimated based on public information and may not reflect current vendor pricing. Verify directly with the vendor.

Ashby's pricing tiers separate core ATS functionality from its most differentiated capabilities — advanced analytics and scheduling automation — which are included at higher tiers. Organisations evaluating Ashby primarily for its analytics depth should confirm that the specific reporting capabilities they require are included in the tier being quoted, as the analytics breadth available at the entry tier differs from the full self-service report builder and capacity planning tools. Implementation is typically completed within two to four weeks for organisations migrating from another ATS, with Ashby's onboarding team providing structured support. According to IndustryLabs analysis of 67 AI-native HR tools, Ashby falls in the £10–25K annual pricing band for typical mid-market deployments — competitive with Greenhouse and Lever for companies of comparable size.

What does Ashby integrate with?

Quick Answer

Ashby integrates natively with Workday, BambooHR, and HiBob for HRIS data synchronisation, with LinkedIn Recruiter for sourcing and profile import, with Slack and Microsoft Teams for hiring notifications and manager workflows, with Zoom and Google Meet for video interview coordination, with DocuSign for e-signature, and with background check providers including Checkr. A REST API supports custom integrations with other HRIS and workflow tools.

Ashby's integration ecosystem is narrower than Greenhouse's 400+ marketplace but covers the core integration categories that fast-growing technology companies require. The Workday integration supports new hire data export for organisations using Workday as their HRIS system of record. BambooHR and HiBob integrations serve the mid-market HRIS segment where Ashby's target customers most commonly sit. The LinkedIn Recruiter integration allows sourced candidates to be pushed into Ashby pipelines with full profile attribution.

Slack integration is particularly well-developed for Ashby's target customer base — technology companies where Slack is the primary communication and workflow tool. Hiring managers receive interview feedback requests, offer approval notifications, and pipeline status summaries in Slack without logging into Ashby, reducing the friction of getting timely decisions from busy engineering and product leaders. Zoom integration generates video interview links automatically within scheduled interview calendar invitations. For context on the applicant tracking systems market and how Ashby's integration depth compares to Greenhouse and Lever, the IndustryLabs category page provides verified comparison data.

Is Ashby GDPR / SOC 2 / ISO 27001 compliant?

Quick Answer

Ashby claims GDPR compliance and SOC 2 Type II certification. For UK and EU employers, GDPR compliance is critical given the volumes of candidate personal data Ashby processes — applications, CVs, interview notes, assessment data, and offer documents. As a relatively newer platform compared to established ATS vendors, buyers in regulated sectors should conduct thorough due diligence on Ashby's data processing practices and sub-processor relationships.

Compliance certifications are vendor-supplied. IndustryLabs has not independently audited these claims. Verify current certification status directly with the vendor.

Ashby's GDPR compliance framework covers the standard requirements for ATS platforms operating in the EU and UK: candidate consent management, configurable data retention periods, data subject rights request handling, and a data processing agreement available for review. Given Ashby's relative newness as a platform compared to Greenhouse or Lever, buyers in regulated sectors — financial services, healthcare, government — should request more detailed documentation of sub-processor relationships, penetration testing history, and incident response procedures as part of their security due diligence, in addition to reviewing the SOC 2 Type II certification report. The CRM's passive candidate data storage has the same GDPR retention and legitimate interest considerations that apply to Lever's CRM layer — buyers should review retention policy controls available for pipeline records held on candidates who have not explicitly applied for a role.

How does Ashby compare to alternatives?

Quick Answer

Ashby's closest alternatives in the all-in-one ATS space are Greenhouse, Lever, and Rippling Recruiting. Greenhouse has greater structured interviewing maturity and a wider integration ecosystem. Lever has a more developed native CRM for long-cycle talent pipeline management. Rippling Recruiting is a natural fit for organisations already using Rippling for HR and payroll. Ashby's primary advantage over all three is analytics depth and scheduling automation within a single platform.

Greenhouse is Ashby's most direct competitor for mid-market technology company buyers. Greenhouse's advantages are its structured hiring methodology ecosystem, its interview kit library, and its 400+ integration marketplace. Ashby's advantages are its analytics depth, scheduling automation, and more modern user interface. The choice frequently comes down to whether a recruiting team prioritises process rigour and integration breadth (Greenhouse) or operational analytics and scheduling efficiency (Ashby).

Lever competes with Ashby in the ATS plus CRM space, with Lever's primary advantage being the more mature talent CRM and pipeline management capabilities that LeverTRM has built over a longer development history. Ashby's primary advantage over Lever is analytics depth and the self-service report builder — teams that want to build custom recruiting metrics without data engineering involvement consistently cite Ashby's analytics as superior to Lever's.

Rippling Recruiting, part of the broader Rippling HR platform, appeals to organisations already standardised on Rippling for HRIS, payroll, and IT management. The integrated data model — one record for the employee from ATS through payroll — is a genuine advantage, but Rippling Recruiting's standalone ATS capabilities are generally less developed than Ashby's or Greenhouse's for organisations that are not Rippling customers elsewhere.


Want a personalised comparison of Ashby vs alternatives matched to your company size, budget, and integrations? Get a free evaluation report →

Buyer concierge

Get a tailored shortlist from 67 AI-native HR platforms

Share your stack, budget, and compliance constraints. We reply with 2-3 vetted options and integration notes — usually within 24 hours.

Open Request Board